Best iPhone hackers court to protect apple Ask FBI
From Charlie Miller he became the first hacker to demonstrate how to take over an iPhone in 2007, which has had a complicated relationship with Apple. They have pirated everything from gifts for the batteries to the iOS App Store, a trick that led Apple to prohibit its developer account in 2011. But now that Apple faces legal fight of his life against the attempt to own FBI to enter their devices, Miller and several other iPhone hackers world class mates have come to the defense of the company.
On Thursday, a group of iPhone hackers and other security researchers presented an amicus coating Apple in its legal battle intensified warrant the FBI to help in cracking an encrypted iPhone that belonged to San Bernardino Rizwan Syed Farook murderer. Those security experts such as Miller, a former NSA elite hacker; Dino Dai Zovi, a known hacker of Apple and co-author of the Hacker IOS Manual; and Jonathan Zdziarski a top forensic expert iPhone has built tools for police to analyze iPhones seized in the past; and computer security and cryptography expert Dan Boneh, Bruce Schneier and Dan Wallach. Your summary has been prepared by lawyers Jennifer Granick and Riana Pfefferkorn Stanford Center for Internet and Society.
That group, many of whom have spent their careers themselves break into iPhones, they warned that the FBI claims represent an unprecedented threat to the security of iPhone and computer security in general. "[We] have dedicated [our] careers to studying and improving security and cryptographic iPhone," the group writes in his writing. "Despite the efforts of the Court, this Order endangers the privacy and safety of users of iPhone and entering digital contact with them. What's worse, it sets a precedent for other orders that would create even greater risks. "
In its brief, hackers and cryptographers meet demand FBI create a new Apple operating system weakened eliminating certain safeguards to prevent attackers repeatedly guess passwords to decrypt phone storage version. They zero in the FBI statement that this operating system has been created for the phone only in the case and not be used by enforcement officials the law, or worse, hackers and cybercriminals-breaking meet other phones in the future . They argue that the crippled operating system could fall out of control of Apple, and security flaws unwanted FBI code using Apple could allow used to decipher other iPhones.
The result of this order is that Apple will be forced to create forensic software that bypasses the access code, but is not limited to the Subject iPhone."
The brief also focuses if the FBI succeeds to fource Apple to create a new version, signed by encryption of your operating system, you can use that precedent to demand after companies push updates software for smartphones or other devices designed to monitor and in so doing, undermine user confidence in the security updates that are critical to keep them safe. In a telephone interview, Miller said that notion as a major threat history to get Apple users to adopt new security updates, which is one of the highest in the technology industry.
The problem of changes surreptitious surveillance, the letter continues, could reach beyond traditional computers to other smart TV's record audio and video users at their home. and features and techniques could be used remotely rather than in a proxy device, and may be even less restricted to a single gadget that FBI's request in the case of San Bernardino iPhone. Court does not call for a tool like this, but Pandora's box that opened.
Fight Apple with the FBI, however, is the safety of iPhones themselves. And despite their relationship, sometimes contradictory with Apple, Charlie Miller says he has been gratified to see Apple constantly improve the protection of the iPhone since it launched for the first time, from the moment that could break it with an attack your Safari browser or even a text message today. phone security increased from 2007, since I am using iPhone, too," says Miller. "I won't to see us go back."
0 comments:
Post a Comment